Advertising disclosure: Some links on this page are affiliate links. If you open an account through them we may earn a commission at no extra cost to you. Providers we list are ones we have โ or are seeking โ an affiliate relationship with, so this is not a survey of the whole market. Commission never affects our editorial rankings, which are our own assessment โ see how we rate. Trading involves significant risk of loss.
FTMO review
Rating is our editorial assessment โ not an aggregate of user reviews.
Established CFD prop firm with a 2-step evaluation and scaling to 90% split.
About prop-firm evaluations: these are simulated/demo trading environments. Most participants do not pass the evaluation, challenge fees are typically non-refundable, and passing does not guarantee a payout. Educational information only โ not financial advice.
Key facts
| Profit split | 80% |
|---|---|
| Max funding | $200,000 |
| Challenge | 2-step |
| Fee from | $99 |
| Payout every | 14 days |
| Platforms | MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade |
| Instruments | Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks |
| Founded | 2015 |
Indicative list figures โ fees, splits and funding change often (promotions, multiple plans). Confirm current terms on FTMOโs website. Last reviewed: July 2026.
Our verdict on FTMO
FTMO is the established CFD-side option here, running a two-phase evaluation from $99 on MT4, MT5, cTrader and DXtrade with an 80% base split that scales towards 90%. The two-phase structure takes longer to reach funding, and the instruments are CFDs โ so index exposure here is not the ES or NQ contract itself.
Best for
- โForex and multi-asset CFD traders who want MT4, MT5 or cTrader rather than futures platforms
- โTraders who prefer a longer-established firm and will trade patiently through two phases
Look elsewhere if
- โTraders who specifically want exchange-traded index futures โ this is a CFD programme
- โTraders who want to reach funding quickly; a two-phase evaluation is slower by design
Watch out:Both phases are simulated with a non-refundable fee, and the majority of attempts do not reach a funded payout. The 80% base split only rises towards 90% through the scaling plan, so the headline scaling figure is not what you start on.
Evaluation structure and true cost
FTMO uses a two-step evaluation from $99, where most futures firms in this group run a single phase. Two phases mean two consecutive sets of targets and rules to satisfy before any funded account exists, which lengthens the time between paying and any possibility of a payout, and adds another point at which an attempt can end. Neither structure is easier; the two-phase model simply front-loads more of the filtering. What it does mean is that the fee sits at risk for longer before you learn the outcome.
The fee is non-refundable and the evaluation is simulated throughout, so the realistic budget is not $99 but $99 multiplied by the number of attempts you might make. Compared with FundedNext, which offers one-step, two-step, Lite and instant models from a similar $99, FTMO is the more focused proposition. Compared with the futures firms here, the structural difference is larger than price: you are being assessed on CFD instruments through MetaTrader rather than on listed futures through Tradovate or Rithmic.
Payout terms and instrument access
Payouts run on roughly a 14-day cycle, slower than the five-day cadence at Topstep, Tradeify and MyFundedFutures and much slower than the daily access at Take Profit Trader and Lucid Trading. The split starts at 80% and rises to 90% through the scaling plan, so the 90% figure describes a destination rather than a starting point. When comparing firms, use the base split and the base cycle โ the terms that apply from your first approved payout โ rather than the best case quoted in marketing.
The instrument range covers forex, indices, metals, commodities, crypto and stocks as CFDs on MT4, MT5, cTrader and DXtrade. For a reader trading ES, NQ, YM and GC, the practical translation is that you would be trading index and metal CFDs referencing those markets, not the exchange contracts, with a different cost structure and no order-book access. If listed futures are specifically what you want to trade, the futures-only firms in this list are the closer match regardless of FTMO's longer record since 2015.
Pros
- + Long-standing reputation and reliable payouts
- + Multi-asset CFD range on MT4/MT5/cTrader
- + Split scales from 80% to 90% via scaling plan
Cons
- โ Base split only 80% before scaling
- โ Two-phase evaluation is slower to fund
Ready to start FTMOโs evaluation?
Not yet available